From ajturner at gmail.com Mon Mar 8 15:25:41 2010 From: ajturner at gmail.com (Andrew Turner) Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2010 18:25:41 -0500 Subject: [Opensearch-discuss] [Geowanking] OGC FilterCapabilities document to describe an OpenSearch Geo service In-Reply-To: <1238443772.9207361268089482379.JavaMail.root@linzimmb01o.imo.intelink.gov> References: <1238443772.9207361268089482379.JavaMail.root@linzimmb01o.imo.intelink.gov> Message-ID: <74F7A802-1973-40F0-8D01-94A0466F885F@gmail.com> I haven't heard of anyone doing this. But consider also that it's not really a 'geo' question but a more general question on possibly adding Boolean operators to the OpenSearch description. It would be similar to saying 'in New York but NOT pizza' Andrew (via mobile) On Mar 8, 2010, at 6:04 PM, Chris Krahe wrote: > Wankers, > > Wondering if anyone's gone through the work of creating an OGC > FilterCapabilities document to describe an OpenSearch Geo service? > > We're looking at doing this to satisfy a customer request, but > realize that other than defining the Operand and Operator types we > support, that there's things the FilterCapabilities document simply > doesn't seem to express. > > The first four capabilities below are implied with OGC Filters, but > OpenSearch doesn't have those concepts ... the last is the reverse: > # spatial reference systems transformation > # property name references > # "not" operator > # multiple spatial filters > # location name as spatial filter > > Unless there's a better solution, we'll probably just include a > written description that describes the subset (and superset) > functionality. > > Chris > > _______________________________________________ > Geowanking mailing list > Geowanking at geowanking.org > http://geowanking.org/mailman/listinfo/geowanking_geowanking.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.opensearch.org/pipermail/opensearch-discuss/attachments/20100308/4b553605/attachment.html