[Opensearch-discuss] [Geowanking] OGC FilterCapabilities document to describe an OpenSearch Geo service

Andrew Turner ajturner at gmail.com
Mon Mar 8 15:25:41 PST 2010


I haven't heard of anyone doing this. But consider also that it's not  
really a 'geo' question but a more general question on possibly adding  
Boolean operators to the OpenSearch description.

It would be similar to saying 'in New York but NOT pizza'

Andrew

(via mobile)

On Mar 8, 2010, at 6:04 PM, Chris Krahe <chris.krahe at ugov.gov> wrote:

> Wankers,
>
> Wondering if anyone's gone through the work of creating an OGC  
> FilterCapabilities document to describe an OpenSearch Geo service?
>
> We're looking at doing this to satisfy a customer request, but  
> realize that other than defining the Operand and Operator types we  
> support, that there's things the FilterCapabilities document simply  
> doesn't seem to express.
>
> The first four capabilities below are implied with OGC Filters, but  
> OpenSearch doesn't have those concepts ... the last is the reverse:
> # spatial reference systems transformation
> # property name references
> # "not" operator
> # multiple spatial filters
> # location name as spatial filter
>
> Unless there's a better solution, we'll probably just include a  
> written description that describes the subset (and superset)  
> functionality.
>
> Chris
>
> _______________________________________________
> Geowanking mailing list
> Geowanking at geowanking.org
> http://geowanking.org/mailman/listinfo/geowanking_geowanking.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.opensearch.org/pipermail/opensearch-discuss/attachments/20100308/4b553605/attachment.html 


More information about the opensearch-discuss mailing list